Abstract (på engelska):
This article focuses on how the European Union’s (EU) mediation activities during the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine conflicts are perceived by local elites. Our analysis is based on recent interviews with decision makers in Ukraine, Israel and Palestine. Consistent with this special issue, we investigate perceptions of EU roles, strategies and effectiveness. We suggest that the EU’s relation to the parties may affect their per- ceptions of EU conflict mediation efforts. Specifically, we expect that the EU is per- ceived as a biased mediator in both cases due to perceived close relations to one or more conflict parties. However, contrary to our expectations and widespread assump- tion in mediation theory, while such a bias exists, we found it is not perceived as a main cause of EU ineffectiveness. Other factors, including the prominence of other mediators and internal EU disunity, are perceived as more detrimental to EU efficacy.
Elgström om EU som partisk medlare
Ole Elgström är huvudförfattare till artikeln "Perceptions of the EU's role in the Ukraine-Russian and the Israel-Palestine conflicts: A biased mediator?", som nyligen publicerats i tidskriften International Negotiation (vol. 23, pp. 299-318). Medförfattare till artikeln är Natalia Chaban, Michèle Knodt, Patrick Muller och Sharon Pardo.