Stina Melander
Universitetslektor
The Personal is Political – And Then What? Ideology, Representation, and Legitimacy in a Swedish Disability Organisation
Författare
Summary, in English
Background: Who can or cannot claim to represent other members within the disability rights movement has been discussed for decades, mainly concerning being disabled as an eligibility prerequisite. Aim(s): The aim is to analyse arguments concerning representational claims within a Swedish disability rights organisation (DHR, Disability Human Rights). Method: Every member of DHR was given the opportunity to answer three open-ended questions. Answers were subjected to a qualitative content analysis. Results: Two main dimensions of arguments were found. The ideological dimension legitimises representation through lived experience or a human rights approach. The pragmatic dimension legitimises representation through relational claims or organisational necessities. Further analysis revealed a paradox: When a representative is required to have a body with certain characteristics, other knowledge-related aspects risk devaluation. Conclusion(s): Paradoxically, the organisation has a goal of rendering impairment irrelevant in society, while rendering impairment a main issue when electing representatives.
Avdelning/ar
- Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
- Civilt samhälle och sociala rörelser
- Socialhögskolan
Publiceringsår
2023-06-21
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
198-211
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Volym
25
Issue
1
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Taylor & Francis
Ämne
- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
- Social Work
- Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Nyckelord
- Disability rights organisation
- elected representative
- representation
- Sweden
Aktiv
Published
Projekt
- Representation in the digital era: Democratic consequences of changing engagement in the Swedish disability movement
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1501-7419