The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Elite communication and affective polarization

Can political elites influence affective polarization among the voters through their social media communication? Does the content of their communication matter or is it enough to get a neutral message from a representative of your favorite or most hated party?

Black and white photo of Hanna Bäck. Photo.
Professor Hanna Bäck, Department of Political Science, Lund University.
Alexander Ryan, black/white photo.
Postdoc Alexander Ryan, Department of Political Science, Lund University.

Hanna Bäck, Royce Carroll, Emma Renström, and Alexander Ryan have tried to answer these questions in a survey experiment. They show that voters interpret neutral messages in a biased manner and become more polarized when getting messages from in- or outgroup representatives. In the article, “Elite communication and affective polarization among voters”, published in Electoral Studies, you can read more about their results.

Authors: Hanna Bäck, Royce Carroll, Emma Renström, Alexander Ryan

Title: Elite Communication and Affective Polarization among Voters

Link to publication: Bäck, H., Carroll, R., Renström, E., & Ryan, A. (2023). Elite communication and affective polarization among voters. Electoral Studies84, 102639. Elite communication and affective polarization among voters - ScienceDirect