The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Who counts when we talk about healthcare and rights? New article by Stina Melander and Julia Bahner

Stina Melander and Julia Bahner, photo.
Stina Melander and Julia Bahner.

During the pandemic, many fell through the cracks of the safety net. For people with long Covid, this became painfully clear: they existed – but were not acknowledged. Now, a new study from Lund University shows how ordinary citizens, in the midst of illness, organised digitally and challenged the authorities’ narrative of what Covid really is.

When the body gives out but society turns a blind eye – they took matters into their own hands

The Swedish Covid strategy was based on voluntarism and personal responsibility – but what happens when no one listens? The study examines the Swedish Covid Association’s stories and struggle, revealing how accounts of previously healthy, working individuals became a path to recognition. But the researchers also issue a warning: this strategy risks rendering invisible those who have never fit the mould of "the productive citizen".

By analysing websites, opinion pieces, and interviews, the researchers show how the association’s narratives became a weapon – not just against the virus, but against a social system where illness is often met with distrust.

For you as a citizen, the study raises an important question: Who counts when we talk about healthcare and rights? And what does it take to be seen – is it always about performance?

Read the full study by Stina Melander and Julia Bahner in the Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research:

“Forced Into an Ableist Narrative? The Swedish Covid Association’s Quest for Recognition.” 
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 27(1): 299–312. 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1234