Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Fariborz Zelli

Fariborz Zelli

Associate professor

Fariborz Zelli

The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: a Framework for Analysis

Author

  • Frank Biermann
  • Philipp Pattberg
  • Harro van Asselt
  • Fariborz Zelli

Summary, in English

Most research on global governance has focused either on theoretical accounts of the overall phenomenon or on empirical studies of distinct institutions that serve to solve particular governance challenges. In this article we analyze instead “governance architectures,” defined as the overarching system of public and private institutions, principles, norms, regulations, decision-making procedures and organizations that are valid or active in a given issue area of world politics. We focus on one aspect that is turning into a major source of concern for scholars and policy-makers alike: the “fragmentation” of governance architectures in important policy domains. The article offers a typology of different degrees of fragmentation, which we describe as synergistic, cooperative, and conflictive fragmentation. We then systematically assess alternative hypotheses over the relative advantages and disadvantages of different degrees of fragmentation. We argue that moderate degrees of fragmentation may entail both significant costs and benefits, while higher degrees of fragmentation are likely to decrease the overall performance of a governance architecture. The article concludes with policy options on how high degrees of fragmentation could be reduced. Fragmentation is prevalent in particular in the current governance of climate change, which we have hence chosen as illustration for our discussion.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

14-14

Publication/Series

Global Environmental Politics

Volume

9

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Project MUSE

Topic

  • Political Science

Keywords

  • FRAGMENTATION
  • international organisations
  • institutional theory
  • climate change
  • UNFCCC
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • climate governance
  • Interplay
  • environmental institutions
  • Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)
  • transnationalism
  • Multi-level governance

Status

Published

Research group

  • Miljöpolitik

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1526-3800