The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Yi Hyun Kang, photo.

Yi Hyun Kang

Postdoctoral fellow

Yi Hyun Kang, photo.

Promise or Peril: How AI Is Discussed in International Environmental Negotiations

Author

  • Yi Hyun Kang

Summary, in English

Articial intelligence (AI) is widely discussed across policy sectors, including global environmental politics. At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2023 (COP28), national governments decided to explore AI’s role in climate solutions and its associated challenges and risks through the #AI4ClimateAction Initiative. In March 2024, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to “seize the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy articial intelligence systems” for sustainable development. While AI is emerging as a public policy topic in international environmental negotiations, there is a signicant knowledge gap about the background of AI discussions in the context of environmental politics. Given that the potential impacts of AI on the environment are expected to be signicant in both
positive and negative ways, it is necessary to understand which discourses are guiding the direction of AI discussions within environmental politics. This article investigates how AI is perceived by different actors in global environmental governance, particularly in the elds of climate, biodiversity, and sustainable development. The article expands knowledge about the early stage of AI discussions in environmental politics, showing that AI is generally framed as a positive technology across different elds. The discussion about AI’s negative environmental impact is marginal. This nding reveals that the current frames of AI supported by various narratives in international environmental negotiations are closely associated with techno-optimistic discourses. As the future trajectory of AI depends on how we leverage AI solutions, balanced deliberation on AI and the environment is required to make technology and sustainability walk together.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • CIRCLE

Publishing year

2025-03-20

Language

English

Publication/Series

Oxford Intersections: AI in Society

Document type

Journal article

Topic

  • Social Sciences
  • Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • AI
  • Climate change
  • biodiversity
  • sustainable development
  • Discourse analysis
  • international environmental governance

Status

Published