Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Roger Hildingsson

Roger Hildingsson

Researcher

Roger Hildingsson

Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: evidence from policy evaluation studies

Author

  • Constanze Haug
  • Tim Rayner
  • Andrew Jordan
  • Roger Hildingsson
  • Johannes Stripple
  • Suvi Monni
  • Dave Huitema
  • Eric Massey
  • Harro van Asselt
  • Frans Berkhout

Summary, in English

Climate change is widely recognised as a 'wicked' policy problem. Agreeing and implementing governance responses is proving extremely difficult. Policy makers in many jurisdictions now emphasise their ambition to govern using the best available evidence. One obvious source of such evidence is the evaluations of the performance of existing policies. But to what extent do these evaluations provide insights into the difficult dilemmas that governors typically encounter? We address this question by reviewing the content of 262 evaluation studies of European climate policies in the light of six kinds of dilemma found in the governance literature. We are interested in what these studies say about the performance of European climate policies and in their capacity to inform evidence-based policy-making. We find that the evaluations do arrive at common findings: that climate change is framed as a problem of market and/or state failure; that voluntary measures tend to be ineffective; that market-based instruments tend to be regressive; that EU-level policies have driven climate policies in the latecomer EU Member States; and that lack of monitoring and weak enforcement are major obstacles to effective policy implementation. However, we also conclude that the evidence base these studies represent is surprisingly weak for such a high profile area. There is too little systematic climate policy evaluation work in the EU to support systematic evidence-based policy making. This reduces the scope for sound policy making in the short run and is a constraint to policy learning in the longer term.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science
  • Miljöpolitik-lup-obsolete
  • BECC - Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2010

Language

English

Pages

427-445

Publication/Series

Climatic Change

Volume

101

Issue

3-4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Topic

  • Political Science

Status

Published

Project

  • ADAM - ADaptation And Mitigation Strategies supporting European climate policy

Research group

  • Miljöpolitik-lup-obsolete

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0165-0009