Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

The Politics of World Heritage

2017-2020 Funded by the Swedish Research Council

UNESCO’s World Heritage (WH) are sites of disputed international processes which have emerged from an inconsistency between commitments to the indivisibility of humanity and reproduction of global hierarchies. Irreconcilable political agendas are mobilised in WH contexts, and claims are strategically used for political purposes. 

This project explores the ways in which WH practices are used in conflicts between states and indigenous peoples and within ethnic conflict. The recurrent militarisation of WH in conflict and the attempts to undermine the cultural identity of rivals are suggestive of an unexplored research agenda. To possess and administer a WH site is culturally legitimising, allowing indigenous peoples who possess a WH site to strengthen their quest for autonomy and rights. States, on the other hand, use WH as a recognition of their inclusive, modern and enlightened politics of cultural heritage, even if the rights of minority peoples are being compromised as a result of such practices.

The project identifies two tensions that characterise global modernity and investigates how these can help to explain the contemporary design and pursuit of the politics of WH. Our research purpose is twofold, first to explore how WH--although frequently prescribed as a solution to a range of global problems--is often entwined with national and international conflicts, and, second, how WH nevertheless, in a promising way, allows for a plurality of global imaginaries to be articulated.