The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Kristina Jönsson

Kristina Jönsson

Head of Department | Associate Professor | Senior Lecturer

Kristina Jönsson

Health policy evolution in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Context, processes and agency

Author

  • Kristina Jönsson
  • Bounfeng Phoummalaysith
  • Rolf Wahlström
  • Göran Tomson

Summary, in English

Abstract in Undetermined
During the last 20 years Lao People's Democratic Republic has successfully developed and adopted some 30 health policies, strategies, decrees and laws in the field of health. Still, the implementation process remains arduous. This article aims at discussing challenges of health policy development and effective implementation by contextualizing the policy evolution over time and by focusing particularly on the National Drug Policy and the Health Care Law. Special attention is given to the role of research in policymaking. The analysis was guided by the conceptual framework of policy context, process, content and actors, combined with an institutional perspective, and showed that effective implementation of a health policy is highly dependent on both structures and agency of those involved in the policy process. The National Drug Policy was formulated and adopted in a short period of time in a resource-scarce setting, but with dedicated policy entrepreneurs and support of concerned international collaborators. Timely introduction of operational health systems research played a crucial role to support the implementation, as well as the subsequent revision of the policy. The development of the Health Care Law took several years and once adopted, the implementation was delayed by institutional legacies and issues concerning the choice of institutional design and financing, despite strong support of the law among the policymakers. Among many factors, timing of the implementation appeared to be of crucial importance, in combination with strong leadership. These two examples show that more research, that problematizes the complex policy environment in combination with improved communication between researchers and policymakers, is necessary to inform about measures for effective implementation. A way forward can be to strengthen the domestic research capacity and the international research collaboration regionally as well as globally.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science

Publishing year

2015

Language

English

Pages

518-527

Publication/Series

Health Policy and Planning

Volume

30

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article review

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Topic

  • Political Science

Keywords

  • policy process
  • policy implementation
  • research to policy
  • National Drug Policy
  • Health Care Law

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0268-1080