The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Katren Rogers

Katren Rogers

Doctoral Student

Katren Rogers

After Asylums and Orphanages

Author

  • Katren Rogers

Summary, in English

In this dissertation, I investigate the effect of partisan politics on the types of care policies that replaced asylums and orphanages between 1950 and 2015. Combining insights from the historical-sociological literature on party formation and theories of welfare politics, I formulate a theory of the partisan politics of care and apply it to two uniquely old care policy areas. While asylums and orphanages have widely been understood as institutions of social control, they also served a social care function, to substitute for family-based care. During the era of deinstitutionalisation, the care of people with chronic and severe mental illness and children who could not be cared for by their parents was shifted away from large, custodial institutions in countries throughout Western Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand. The deinstitutionalisation movement was shaped by changing scientific knowledge and ideas, professional specialisation, the lobbying of action groups against asylums and orphanages, and growing fiscal pressure. But asylums and orphanages could not simply be closed down. Governments were faced with choices about who should become responsible for the care of formerly institutionalised populations: the state, the market, the family, or voluntary providers. I demonstrate that these choices were decisively shaped by partisan conflict, not only over redistribution, but also over how society should be organised: around individuals or families. This study of the multidimensional politics of care policy contributes to theoretical debates in comparative politics about the dimensionality of party competition and how partisanship shapes welfare policy making over time. The empirical conclusions will also be of broader interest to scholars of the relationship between science and policy making.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Document type

Dissertation

Publisher

Lund

Topic

  • Political Science

Keywords

  • partisan politics
  • multidimensional politics
  • deinstitutionalisation
  • welfare state
  • care

Status

Published

Supervisor

  • Johannes Lindvall
  • Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 978-91-8039-444-4
  • ISBN: 978-91-8039-443-7

Defence date

2 December 2022

Defence time

10:00

Defence place

Edens hörsal, Allhelgona kyrkogata 14, Lund

Opponent

  • Julian Garritzmann (Professor)