The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Fariborz Zelli

Fariborz Zelli

Professor | Principal Investigator BECC

Fariborz Zelli

The Consequences of a Fragmented Climate Governance Architecture: a Policy Appraisal


  • Fariborz Zelli
  • Frank Biermann
  • Philipp Pattberg
  • Harro van Asselt


  • Frank Biermann
  • Philipp H. Pattberg
  • Fariborz Zelli

Summary, in English

This chapter complements the analysis in Chapter 2 by a policy-oriented inquiry of how different degrees of fragmentation of governance architectures are likely to affect the environmental effectiveness of policies. Our study relates here to an area of widespread contestation in academic and policy writing. It is often maintained, as we describe further below, that a more integrated climate governance architecture would promise higher effectiveness. This claim, however, is also contested, and several authors emphasize the potential benefits of a multitude of agreements, institutions and approaches within an overall fragmented architecture. Claims in favour and against stronger or lesser fragmentation are found in a variety of literatures, ranging from international relations and international law to the comparative study of environmental policy. We review these claims here, organized along the questions of: (1) the relative speed of reaching agreements; (2) the level of regulatory ambition that can be realized; (3) the level of potential participation of actors and sectors; and (4) the equity concerns involved. The four aspects of speed, ambition, participation and equity are interrelated and eventually will have a bearing on overall governance performance. Based on our typology in the previous chapter (Biermann et al., this volume, Chapter 2), we view the propositions as a continuum of different claims as to the relative positive or negative consequences of higher (conflictive) or lower (synergistic) degrees of fragmentation.

Publishing year







Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012. Architecture, Agency and Adaptation

Document type

Book chapter


  • Political Science


  • climate governance
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • global governance
  • fragmentation
  • complexity
  • institutions
  • institutional analysis
  • Institutional Theory
  • multi-level governance



Research group

  • Miljöpolitik


  • ISBN: 978-0-521-19011-4