Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Profile picture of Åsa Knaggård. Photo.

Åsa Knaggård

Associate professor

Profile picture of Åsa Knaggård. Photo.

What do policy-makers do with scientific uncertainty? The incremental character of Swedish climate change policy-making.

Author

  • Åsa Knaggård

Summary, in English

This article explores how policy-makers are managing scientific uncertainty in policy-making. This is done through a case study of the Swedish climate change policy process from 1975 to 2007, based on interviews and an extensive review of official publications and documents. The study shows that scientific uncertainty played a very marginal role in the development of Swedish climate politics. When faced with scientific uncertainty, policy-makers came to rely more on knowledge of what was politically possible to do, than on what was desirable from a scientific perspective. Thereby, policy-making became incremental in character. The article argues that in order to understand the dynamics involved, we need to pay attention to how scientific knowledge and uncertainty are translated from a scientific context into a political one. These framings, done by knowledge brokers, are crucial for the use of scientific knowledge in politics. Scientific uncertainty negatively impacts scientists' willingness to act as knowledge brokers and thereby the possibility of policy-makers to use knowledge. The article argues that despite the lessons from previous research, there seems to be a need for empirically grounded studies that highlight the limits of the rational paradigm captured in, for example, evidence-based decision-making.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science
  • Miljöpolitik-lup-obsolete
  • Förvaltning - demokrati-lup-obsolete
  • BECC - Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2014

Language

English

Pages

22-39

Publication/Series

Policy Studies

Volume

35

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Routledge

Topic

  • Political Science

Keywords

  • scientific uncertainty
  • policy-making
  • knowledge
  • incrementalism
  • climate change
  • Sweden

Status

Published

Research group

  • Miljöpolitik-lup-obsolete
  • Förvaltning - demokrati-lup-obsolete

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0144-2872