The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Black and white photo of Annika Fredén. Photo.

Annika Fredén

Associate Senior Lecturer

Black and white photo of Annika Fredén. Photo.

Coalitions, Coordination and Electoral Choice : A Lab Experimental Study of Strategic Voting

Author

  • ANNIKA FREDÉN

Editor

  • André Blais
  • Jean-François Laslier
  • Karine Van der Straeten

Summary, in English

When a voter chooses between large and small parties in a coalition, strategic reasons may be the tie-breaker. “Strategic voting” is often defined as a vote for another party than one’s most preferred one with the intention to affect the outcome of the election. The presence of coalitions can sometimes be argued to lead to less strategic voting, whereas others claim that coalitions create more strategic incentives. This chapter looks at how the relative strength of parties in a coalition affect voters’ tendency to vote strategically. Comparing two contexts with more or less uncertainty about which parties will make it to the parliament, the findings are that voters cast strategic votes for small parties to a greater extent when there are substantial size differences between the coalition parties. Individual expectations of parties’ likelihood of success are crucial to the decision making.

Department/s

  • Department of Political Science

Publishing year

2016

Language

English

Pages

191-213

Publication/Series

Voting Experiments

Volume

Part III

Document type

Book chapter

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Topic

  • Political Science

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-40573-5
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-40571-1