The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Black and white photo of Annika Fredén. Photo.

Annika Fredén

Associate Senior Lecturer

Black and white photo of Annika Fredén. Photo.

Word embeddings on ideology and issues from Swedish parliamentarians’ motions : a comparative approach

Author

  • Annika Fredén
  • Moa Johansson
  • Denitsa Saynova

Summary, in English

Quantitative analysis of large-scale political text data in the form of word embeddings has great potential for systematising differences between political parties. We examine the differences between embeddings obtained from speakers from the two competitors for the PM position in Sweden (Social Democrats and Moderates) over a 30-year period. The goal is to compare how off-the-shelf general pre-trained models perform relative to pre-training on a smaller dataset from the same domain. In the analysis, we focus on two types of concepts: issues and ideological terms. We find that generally, the off-the-shelf pre-trained models lead to more reliable results and greater emphasis on ideological differences between the studied parties.

Department/s

  • LU Profile Area: Natural and Artificial Cognition
  • Department of Political Science

Publishing year

2024-12-04

Language

English

Publication/Series

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Routledge

Topic

  • Political Science
  • Computer and Information Science

Keywords

  • machine learning
  • Parliaments
  • text as data
  • word embeddings
  • word embeddings
  • parties
  • ideology

Status

Inpress

Project

  • Bias and methods of AI technology studying political behavior

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1745-7289