Javascript är avstängt eller blockerat i din webbläsare. Detta kan leda till att vissa delar av vår webbplats inte fungerar som de ska. Sätt på javascript för optimal funktionalitet och utseende.

Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Profilbild på Åsa Knaggård. Foto.

Åsa Knaggård

Docent

Profilbild på Åsa Knaggård. Foto.

A fair distribution of responsibility for climate adaptation-translating principles of distribution from an international to a local context

Författare

  • Erik Persson
  • Kerstin Eriksson
  • Åsa Knaggård

Summary, in English

Distribution of responsibility is one of the main focus areas in discussions about climate change ethics. Most of these discussions deal with the distribution of responsibility for climate change mitigation at the international level. The aim of this paper is to investigate if and how these principles can be used to inform the search for a fair distribution of responsibility for climate change adaptation on the local level. We found that the most influential distribution principles on the international level were in turn built on one or more of seven basic principles: (P1) equal shares, (P2) desert, (P3) beneficiary pays, (P4) ability, (P5) self-help, (P6) limited responsibility for the worst off, and (P7) status quo preservation. It was found that all the basic principles, but P1, P3, and P7, are to some extent translatable to local climate adaptation. Two major problems hamper their usefulness on the local level: (1) several categories of agents need to take on responsibility; and (2) emissions do not work as a base for all principles. P4, P5, and P6 are applicable to local adaptation without changes. P4 is of particular importance as it seems to solve the first problem. P2 is applicable only if the second problem is solved, which can be achieved by using risk of harm instead of emissions as the basis for desert.

Avdelning/ar

  • Filosofiska institutionen
  • Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publiceringsår

2021-09

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Philosophies

Volym

6

Issue

3

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

MDPI AG

Ämne

  • Ethics

Nyckelord

  • Climate change adaptation
  • Fair distribution
  • Forward-looking responsibility
  • Local adaptation
  • Responsibility

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 2409-9287