What militant democrats and technocrats share

Summary, in English

In their efforts to prevent democratic backsliding, militant democrats have traditionally been sympathetic to technocratic arrangements. Does this sympathy imply a logical congruence? Comparing theories of militant democracy and epistemic technocracy (aka epistocracy), I discover a common approach to basic aspects of representative democracy. Both theories see voters as fallible or ignorant instead of capable political agents; and they both understand political parties to be channels of state rule rather than democratic expression. This shared suspicion of grassroots political agency explains why they employ non-democratic means to pursue their goals. But the two theories appear to be also analytically co-extensive. Like militant democrats, epistemic technocrats polemicize antidemocrats inasmuch as the latter are proxies for epistemically foul decision-making. Conversely, militant democrats try to block ‘incorrect’ decisions as long as these lead to democratic subversion, thereby producing a distinct type of militant technocracy. The article ends by drawing the implications of this symbiosis of epistemic and militant democratic ideas for contemporary democratic theory.

• Författare: Anthoula Malkopoulou
• Avdelning/ar: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
• Publiceringsår: 2023
• Språk: Engelska
• Sidor: 437-460
• Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)
• Volym: 26
• Issue: 4
• Länkar: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1782047
• Dokumenttyp: Artikel i tidskrift
• Förlag: Taylor & Francis
• Ämne: Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
• Nyckelord: political theory; militant democracy; epistocracy; conception of voters; political parties
• Status: Published
• ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt: ISSN: 1369-8230